We Make You Think

World of Warcraft: Additional Character Slots

On Monday, March 19, 2012, the nondisclosure agreement (NDA) was lifted on a Blizzard press event held the week before. The topic of the press event was the upcoming World of Warcraft expansion, Mists of Pandaria. As a result of the end of the NDA, the internet was flooded with new information regarding the expansion. Among the topics fans eagerly awaited news for was the issue of character slot limitations. Currently players are limited to 10 characters per server with a cap of 50 characters per account. With the introduction of a new race and a new class, players began seeking an increase in the number of allotted characters per server. Blizzard heard their requests and announced . . . an 11th character slot. Upon reading the news my immediate reaction was “that’s it?”

I know that the largest criticism of my viewpoint is that I am a spoiled, self-entitled fan with no appreciation for the difficulty associated with game development. I mean, does nothing make me happy? But if that is the way you feel I urge you to look at this issue from another angle. World of Warcraft was released in 2004 with the same character limitations that exist today. At the time, there were 8 races:


  1. Human
  2. Dwarf
  3. Night Elf
  4. Gnome


  1. Orc
  2. Undead
  3. Tauren
  4. Troll

There were 9 total classes:

  1. Druid
  2. Hunter
  3. Mage
  4. Paladin (Alliance only)
  5. Priest
  6. Rogue
  7. Shaman (Horde only)
  8. Warlock
  9. Warrior.

To put that in perspective, when the game was released players could create one character of every race and have two spare slots. They could create one character of every class and have one spare slot. Fast forward through three expansions and the lists have noticeably grown. With the addition of Blood Elves and Draenei in The Burning Crusade and the addition of Goblins and Worgen in Cataclysm, the number of races jumped from 8 to 12. With the addition of Death Knights as a class in Wrath of the Lich King, the total number of classes went from 9 to 10.

In Mists of Pandaria, Blizzard will be adding both a new race, the Pandaren, and a new class, the Monk. Is it any surprise that players feel the need for more character slots? In over 7 years time, new races and a class have been introduced with no change to character slot limits. Players have been asking for more character slots per server for a long time, though Mists of Pandaria has made the issue reach a boiling point.

On June 9, 2010, MMO-Champion reported on a new survey being conducted by Blizzard that asked players “If Blizzard allowed you to purchase an extra character slot on a realm for a small fee, how interested would you be in doing that?”

Obviously only Blizzard knows the results of the survey, but it is important to realize that the extra character slot discussion has been happening for some time, and Blizzard has been seriously considering the issue since at least June 2010. Additionally, on June 13, 2010, WoWHead News posted an exclusive interview with Ghostcrawler, the lead systems designer for World of Warcraft. In part it reads:

Malgayne: Lots and lots of people were asking about raising the character limit per server.

Ghostcrawler: *laughs*

Malgayne: That’s a very common question, especially since you’ve got twelve races now instead of ten, but only ten slots.

Ghostcrawler: Yeah. Um…there are—it’s funny, there are really mixed views on that on the team. Some are like well, why don’t we just do it, people are asking for it? but then others are like, players say they want it, but do they really want it? Or are they just like, camping on a bunch of names for alts and stuff like that? Are they really playing all of those 10 characters pretty regularly? And I think where we left it is, we were going to do some pretty hardcore research to try and figure out how many players are really at that cap, and are they at that cap legitimately, or do they have like, six level ones they never play, or something like that.

I have to question Ghostcrawler’s rationale here. While I agree that players using their 10 character slots to reserve names for alts does not urge a change in the system, I disagree that players must regularly be playing 10 characters for it to matter. Admittedly, it depends on how you define “regularly” but if I have leveled a character to the level cap and do not touch it again until the next expansion, Ghostcrawler cannot seriously be suggesting I should delete it to make room for something else. That is absurd.

With the bonus to experience and the ability to freely grant levels from the Recruit-a-Friend program, the recently revamped Scroll of Resurrection program which gives a player an instant level 80 character, and guild perks and heirloom gear that gives experience bonuses, players are leveling alts faster than ever. Surely this increase in the number of alts is something Blizzard should have foreseen.

So what was I hoping for Blizzard to announce? Nakatoir, a community manager from the European Blizzard forums, said this about extra character slots:

This matter was already brought up at Blizzcon. What is currently being considered by the development team is that we will not increase the total character limit per account; but what we may be doing is allowing more characters per realm, so you may have a gigantic list of characters on one realm!

No promises though, but hope this little bit of info helps ^^

Source: http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/2868763386#5

That was posted November 18, 2011. It was said as something Blizzard would like to do, not something Blizzard will do, but I was really hoping this solution would make it into the game. Failing that though, I never expected the alternative to be an 11th character slot. The 11th slot was a given in my eyes. I could not see Blizzard releasing Mists of Pandaria without it, and I would have suspended my subscription in protest if they had. How did the final solution go from no server cap to 11 though? Why not 25 per server? It just does not make sense. Rather than striking a middle ground Blizzard went for the absolute minimum. To restore the game to its vanilla equivalent of having two more slots than races, it would need to be 15 per server come Mists of Pandaria. I think that is a reasonable middle-ground if no server cap is unobtainable.

And I am not alone in this feeling either. When WoWInsider reported on this news, the comments were filled with people sharing my sentiment. While it was an insufficient sampling size to get a sense for what the playerbase feels at large, perhaps one commenter is correct in saying it is not over yet. An argument I find particularly compelling for adding more than 11 slots is the desire to create a Pandaren and a Monk separately. How many Blood Elf Paladins are there? Or Draenei Shamans? Many players hate seeing the same race and class combination become so prevalent. With all but two races capable of becoming Monks, many players want to create something besides a Pandaren Monk, and that is perfectly reasonable.

Blizzard, please reconsider only adding one more character slot. Change has been needed for years and this solution is simply inadequate.

You May Also Like:

  • This week on WoW Insider, the Community Blog Topic is, “Is leveling too easy?” No. Last week, MMORPG.com ran a guest article written ...

  • The topic for this week’s Community Blog Topic is whether servers should be merged. This question hits a little close to home for me right now ...

  • On October 10, 2011 Blizzard announced a new in-game pet for World of Warcraft that would become available at their online store called the Guar ...


  1. 11 is fine. One of each class. Races are almost entirely cosmetic and largely irrelevant. While I’ll admit I put a very great deal of thought into the choice anyway, I certainly don’t feel the need to play more than one of any given class just to see a different skin do all the same things. We do have respecs after all.

    Now, on the other hand, I don’t think any of Blizzard’s reasons for keeping a server limit at all address any of my concerns, so perhaps it’s for them to defend this decision a little bit more transparently.

    • I understand you don’t personally need more than 11 slots, but could you see it as something other players could reasonably want? If for no other reason than wanting both a non-monk Pandaren and a Pandaren something else? I don’t think it’s reasonable to ask players to delete an existing character for that, even if the character isn’t 85 yet.

      And what about the consideration that when the game came out there were far more character slots than one per class? Doesn’t it feel like Blizzard is now just giving us a bare minimum?

      It’s interesting you mention Blizzard’s reason for keeping the server limit. I’m unaware of a reason at all. I’d love it if you could link me to a statement from them explaining their decision.

  2. Arsonor /

    I can understand many folks only wanting or using 10 or less slots. But I plan exclusively on one server with a guild and friend group that has been growing and active for 5-6 years. I have one character of each class at the current level cap of 85. I’ve barely scratched the surface of the new low level content brought on by Cataclysm because my characters had already leveled past it, and I don’t want to “play down” to see it. I’d rather experience it at the appropriate level. My main raiding character is a mage, but I’d love to level one again from scratch to see what it is like with a different spec or race… and using the new talent rules that are vastly different when I first leveling the character years ago. The issue has to be data storage. I can only play one character at a time, so it doesn’t increase server traffic. All of my characters are horde side as well… I’d like to see things from the Alliance side on the same server.

    I’ve considered using a second account to have more characters on my server of choice, however I wouldn’t have access to the heirloom gear that I’ve invested much time to acquire. I could transfer one character to another server with a bunch of heirlooms, but then I’d still have to play on another server. I would pay extra. I hope they are still considering upping the number.

    • Unfortunately, I don’t think it’s still a consideration. The World of Warcraft community is very vocal about things typically, but the announcement of an 11th character slot wasn’t met with a lot of anger. A lot of people were content with the 1 slot and those that were upset didn’t really rally together. I suggest you voice your opinion on the official forums to help get the message across to Blizzard that an 11th character slot isn’t enough.

  3. Justin /

    I totally agree with this article/blog/opinion piece (whatever it is.) I currently have 10 characters on my main Server, one of each class all leveled to 85. I was hoping the server limit was going to increase at LEAST by two slots so I could make a Monk to level as well as a Panadaren in one of the other classes. But with this limitation I am either forced to play a Pandaren Monk OR pay for a race change for one of my other classes. (Or delete a perfectly good 85 to re-level as a different race, which after going through the leveling thing so many times, is not an option for me.) Oh well.

    • Let’s call it an article, that makes it sound more official :) I’ve been trying very hard to get players to rally behind the idea of additional character slots, but unfortunately people seem to have accepted the 11th character slot as all they will receive.

      It’s an insufficient sample size, but I’ve been asking people I come across in LFR and LFD and the overwhelming majority agree they’d prefer more character slots.

      I’m just waiting for the day Blizzard announces a new paid service to expand the number of character slots. Maybe that will light a fire under everyone to demand that it should be a free service.

  4. Hoodsmage /

    I have 10 toons at 85 current lvl cap it sucks to be maxed on server cap goto another server and have nothing to start new toons with i would love to be able to have 15 toon slots on my main server

  5. I know this is an old article and we now have 11 slots, but I am now 3/4 done leveling my eleventh 90. After that the game is a dead end for me because I like to level characters. And I do not want to level a character on another server, away from my husband and guild and friends. I also like having all of my characters on one server because they craft and farm stuff for each other. My longtime characters also give some cash to the new one, pay for their flying etc. I would rather start playing a new MMO than level a character on a different WOW server.

    • My hunch is that when connected realms are created, we’ll all effectively have 22 slots per “server.” I feel as though we’ll be able to create characters on either connected realm, and they will function exactly as though they were one one realm.

      It’s not an elegant solution, and it could be disabled if Blizzard really wanted to, but my feeling is that it’ll be an option.

  6. I don’t care about this, now i’m making average $5000 a month.
    There is tricky way i found on the internet.
    If you want to learn it too, just type in google: Ruthiezx’s method to earn online

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2011-2016 Clever Musings All Rights Reserved